20,695 decisions across Orange County BZA

SE-06-10-008 — THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant is proposing a new sanctuary and administration building. The buildings will be oriented towards Apopka-Vineland Road. Staff informed the BZA the request was consistent with the development trend of the area. There was no opposition at the hearing.

VA-06-10-018 — LANCE AND BONNIE WALL Decision: Approved Hearing: This is a corner lot with an irregular shape; deep angulation of the lot lines contributes to the need for a variance. The house was built in 1955, prior to zoning, and is situated on the far backside of the lot. A portion of the backside of the house already encroaches into the rear yard setback. The applicant is

SE-06-10-027 — ROYAL ESTATES P-D Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant is proposing 36 townhouse units. On June 14, 2006, the County's Development Review Committee reviewed and approved the design standards for this project. Staff advised the BZA the request was consistent with the development trend of the area. There was no opposition.

SE-06-10-024 — JOHN EASTMAN Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant proposes a detached ADU (Accessory Dwelling Unit) for their daughter and grandson to reside in. The applicant spoke before the Board and stated her daughter is a young divorcee with an infant son, and having them reside nearby would greatly assist the mother and child. Staff noted the most affected property owne

VA-06-10-021 — WYNDHAM RESORT AND SPA Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant is proposing a 130 unit hotel. The height is proposed at 120 ft. Staff gave a brief presentation and provided an analysis of the surrounding landscape. The applicant met with the neighbors to the north who reside on Crescent Drive. 2 residents spoke with concerns. They were not opposed to the hei

SE-06-10-004 — WARREN W. WUBKER Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant is proposing an equestrian facility for private and public use. A maximum of 24 horses are proposed. Staff gave a brief presentation. In conclusion, staff supports the request. The BZA felt the request blended with the adjacent uses. There was no opposition.

VA-06-10-022 — DANIEL CHINELLI Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant proposes to add more living area to his home and requests to have the addition "line up" with the existing house. Staff noted the home was constructed prior to Zoning and a small portion of the existing home encroaches into the side yard setback. Two commentaries in favor were received and none in opposition

VA-06-10-023 — Margaret Walker Decision: Partial Approval

VA-06-10-012 — Harris Development, Inc. Decision: Partial Approval

SE-06-10-001 — CENTRAL NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH OF GOD Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant proposes to construct a multi-purpose building that would be used for Sunday school classrooms, church office and fellowship hall. An existing modular unit that is currently being used as the church office would be removed from the site. The proposed building would be connected to the exis

VA-06-10-005 — SUNROOM DESIGNS, LLC Decision: Approved Hearing: The property is located in the Winter Park Pines Subdivision. The applicant proposes to replace an old aluminum screened room at the back of the house with a permanent room addition, which requires compliance with the 30-foot setback requirement. The size is 15 ' x 22 '. The amount of deviation is minor, being only fi

VA-06-10-017 — TIM AND SUSAN BUDREAU Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant is proposing a detached garage in front of her new home. The garage will not have any doors visible from the street. The applicant stated they were trying to save numerous live oak trees. They submitted photographs which depicted the trees. Staff concluded the request met the variance criteria. Th

VA-06-10-006 — CHARLES E. THOMPSON Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant proposes to construct a 6-foot block wall in his front yard to reduce traffic noise and visibility. The property is located on a minor arterial road. Staff indicated the BZA recently granted a height variance for a block wall in the front yard of a residence in the neighborhood. The property owners on bot

VA-06-10-002 — ESPERANZA ARCE Decision: Denied Hearing: The applicant stated the foundation was poured in error along the westerly property line and is requesting a variance to correct the deficiency. The property owner most affected, addressed a letter to the Board with their concerns and a request for denial. Staff stated the applicant did not demonstrate that she had met the var

VA-06-10-010 — MURRAY AND GAIL GRAHAM Decision: Denied

VA-06-10-025 — LUIS MIGUEL POCKELS Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant's lot and two adjacent lots are 10 feet shorter in depth than other same-shaped lots in the subdivision, which contributes towards the need for a variance. The proposed addition backs up to a large accessory building on an Agriculturally zoned parcel. Several commentaries were submitted in favor. There

VA-06-10-007 — DAVID F. SLAMIN Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant stated the 19' x 22' porch at the back of the house was built about 10 years ago, prior to his purchasing the property. The porch is in line with the rest of the house on that side. The house was built in 1963. There is opaque fencing between the subject property and property to the south. There is adequat

VA-06-10-015 — JAMES EWING, JR. Decision: Approved Hearing: The subdivision was the subject of an administrative rezoning to R-CE in 1983 pursuant to adopting the County's Growth Management Policy. The lot sizes are typical of an R-1A subdivision. The lots sizes were "grandfathered-in" pursuant to the administrative rezoning. However, R-CE performance standards such as building se

VA-06-10-009 — LARRY BRIGNAC Decision: Approved Hearing: Staff received a letter of approval from Keene's Pointe Architectural Review Committee and a letter of no objection from the most affected adjacent property owner. Six commentaries in favor were received and none in opposition. The Board stated the request was minimal and approved the variance with conditions imposed by st

VA-06-10-014 — SAMUEL JAMES CLOSE Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant spoke before the Board and stated the setback error was discovered during the construction of the home. Staff received 7 commentaries in favor and 1 in opposition. The applicant submitted a letter in support from the adjacent property owner and a letter of approval from Woodbridge on the Green homeowner's as

VA-06-10-003 — Carl H. Parker Request: re: Parker Decision: Approved

VA-06-10-013 — Howard Koyl Decision: Approved

VA-06-10-016 — Leigh Beyer Decision: Approved

VA-06-10-026 — Jesus Miranda Decision: Approved

ZMA06-0046 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2006-10-04 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.

ZMA06-0045 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2006-10-02 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.

ZMA06-0043 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2006-09-22 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.

ZMA06-0042 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2006-09-21 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.

CPA06-0040 Type: Comprehensive Plan — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Filed: 2006-09-12 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County CPA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.

SE-06-09-009 — Gypsela Garcia Decision: Partial Approval

VA-06-09-022 — Laurence Lentz Decision: Partial Approval

SE-06-09-001 — T-Mobile South, LLC Decision: Partial Approval

SE-06-09-003 — CLEMENCE GODIN Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant wants to operate a lawn care/landscaping business out of a residence. No new construction is proposed. The site will not have any signage nor will any customers visit the site. Staff gave an analysis of the request and recommended approval. There was no opposition.

SE-06-09-005 — MISSION OF HOPE WORSHIP CENTER Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant requests to use an existing office building for a religious use facility and variance to allow unpaved parking. The applicant raised concerns that a revised site-plan may be submitted at a later date due to retention pond placement at the site may change the location of parking spaces. Staff inf

VA-06-09-013 — MICHELLE BARKER Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant proposes a detached garage 24 feet in height. The garage will be used for storage and to park a boat and recreational vehicle. The BZA concluded this request was reasonable in the Wedgefield development. There was no opposition at the hearing.

VA-06-09-008 — Donald Oberdick Decision: Partial Approval

VA-06-09-004 — NAPHALETA HIBBERT Decision: Approved Hearing: The Board questioned whether the applicant received approval from the homeowner's association. The applicant informed the Board verbal approval was received from the homeowner's association. Staff noted that the Board granted similar variance requests in this subdivision. The Board unanimously approved the request. There wa

VA-06-09-010 — Juan J. Amat Decision: Partial Approval

VA-06-09-002 — MICHAEL T. RUSH Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant is proposing an addition to the north side of their residence. The proposed addition will total approximately 369 square feet and will be 7 feet 10 inches from the side street property line. 77 square feet of the addition encroach into the rear setback. Staff deemed the variance minor in nature. There was

VA-06-09-017 — DAVID BRASCH Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant is remodeling his house. A small portion of the remodel is 46 feet from the normal high water elevation of Lake Butler. Staff advised the BZA 3 similar variances have been granted in this subdivision. The BZA concluded the request was minimal. There was no opposition.

VA-06-09-019 — KAREN R. KASSIK Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant is proposing to build an addition to the rear of their home. There are essentially two areas of the proposed addition that would encroach the rear setback. The first area of encroachment is to the northeast end of the home, which is for roughly 100 square feet. The other end of the addition on the southeast po

SE-06-09-015 — DALE VOLKERT Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant proposes to use an existing residence as a detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU) and a variance to allow ADU of 1,671 square feet in lieu of 1,000 square feet. The applicant informed the BZA of his parent's health issues and the need to have them reside nearby. The parents would reside in the ADU and the applica

VA-06-09-014 — HAMPTON INN Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant proposes additional hotel suites. The site will have 266 parking spaces instead of 279 spaces. This constitutes a 5% deficiency. The applicant's traffic engineer presented parking analysis study, which showed a percentage of shared parking spaces due to multiple users on-site. The BZA accepted the justificatio

VA-06-09-020 — THOMAS J. LAREAU Decision: Approved

VA-06-09-018 — DONALD MARTIN Decision: Approved

VA-06-09-006 — ROBERT ZLATKISS Request: CONSTRUCT 2 STORY ADDITION TO SFR 0 FT FROM PROPERTY LINE IN LIEU OF 10 FT Decision: Denied Hearing: see documents section

SE-06-09-011 — JOHN K. SMITH Decision: Approved Hearing: Some of the proposed dwelling units are within 100 feet of the property lines of the two parcels of land containing single family residential homes. The closest distance is 30-feet to the north parcel, and 40-68 feet to the east parcel. The Future Land Use Designation for the east parcel has been changed to commercial (P-D co

VA-06-09-016 — RADISSON HOTEL Decision: Approved

VA-06-09-007 — Loretta L. Stewart Decision: Approved

VA-06-09-021 — Elena Pena-Perez Decision: Approved