20,695 decisions across Orange County BZA
Every variance, appeal, and land-use ruling issued by the Orange County Board of Zoning Adjustment, extracted from the official meeting record. Search by case number, street, applicant, or keyword — click any decision to see the full ruling, vote tally, and affected parcels.
- Variance — approvedVA-05-12-016Orange CountyDec 1, 2005
VA-05-12-016 — GEOFFREY SMITH Request: SW 1/4 31-24-29 60 ft. x 120 ft. Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant is requesting a 2-story addition 10 feet from the rear property line. Staff expressed concerns about the proximity of the 2-story addition to the home to the rear. The BZA felt this would establish a negative precedent in the Hunters Creek development. The a
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-12-009Orange CountyDec 1, 2005
VA-05-12-009 — ROGER L FEE Request: CONSTRUCT STORAGE ROOM/ SUMMER KITCHEN WITHIN SETBACKS Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant proposes a small storage area and summer kitchen onto the side of his house to entertain guests. The applicant obtained letters of no objection from his neighbors. There was no opposition.
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-12-008Orange CountyDec 1, 2005
VA-05-12-008 — TRACY McLENDON Request: SE 1/4 of SW 1/4 32-22-31 50 ft. x 105 ft. Decision: Approved
View decision → - Variance — approvedSE-05-12-019Orange CountyDec 1, 2005
SE-05-12-019 — McCREE ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, INC. Request: VETINARY CLINIC W/ BOARDING FACILITIES Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant designed the proposed building with a residential style for compatibility with up-coming residential development in the area. There was no opposition to this request. There were several commentaries submitted in favor. The applicant ag
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-12-020Orange CountyDec 1, 2005
VA-05-12-020 — KAREN LeMONNIER Request: NW 1/4 of SE 1/4 24-24-31 1.85 acres Decision: Partial Approval Hearing: The applicant proposes to enclose an existing carport. The carport currently has side setback of 8.5 ft. The applicant only wants to continue that side setback for the enclosure. The applicant is also requesting to place a new garage in front of the old one
View decision → - Variance — approvedSE-05-12-010Orange CountyDec 1, 2005
SE-05-12-010 — RENEWAL BAPTIST CHURCH OF ORLANDO Request: NE 1/4 19-22-29 65 ft. x 125 ft. Decision: Approved Hearing: The pastor for the church addressed the BZA and agreed with the findings and recommendations of staff. The pastor stated they have been a very small church for a long time and do not anticipate rapid growth in the near future. There was no opposit
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-12-002Orange CountyDec 1, 2005
VA-05-12-002 — Susanne Jerome Decision: Approved
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-12-006Orange CountyDec 1, 2005
VA-05-12-006 — James Reynolds Decision: Approved
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-12-005Orange CountyDec 1, 2005
VA-05-12-005 — Kevin Font Decision: Approved
View decision → - OtherVA-05-12-013Orange CountyDec 1, 2005
VA-05-12-013 — MICHELLE BARKER Request: SE 1/4 02-23-32 150 ft. x 297 ft. Hearing: The applicant proposes a home with a detached accessory building. The accessory building will be used for storage. The pitched roof exceeds the 15 foot height limit. There was no opposition.
View decision → - Rezoning — approvedZMA06-0004Osceola CountyNov 23, 2005
ZMA06-0004 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2005-11-23 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.
View decision → - Rezoning — approvedZMA06-0003Osceola CountyNov 22, 2005
ZMA06-0003 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2005-11-22 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.
View decision → - Rezoning — approvedZMA06-0002Osceola CountyNov 21, 2005
ZMA06-0002 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2005-11-21 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.
View decision → - Rezoning — approvedZMA06-0001Osceola CountyNov 8, 2005
ZMA06-0001 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2005-11-08 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.
View decision → - OtherSE-05-10-002Orange CountyNov 3, 2005
SE-05-10-002 — Mohini Lakraj, agent for Shiv Temple Request: OUTDOOR RECREATION & OVERFLOW PARKING Decision: Denied
View decision → - Variance — deniedVA-05-11-004Orange CountyNov 3, 2005
VA-05-11-004 — Ann Buczkowski Request: 30 ft. in lieu of 35 ft front and 38 ft. in lieu of 50 ft. rear Decision: Denied
View decision → - Variance — deniedVA-05-11-005Orange CountyNov 3, 2005
VA-05-11-005 — Clear Channel Outdoor Decision: Denied
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-11-012Orange CountyNov 3, 2005
VA-05-11-012 — CRAIG FARGO Request: SE 1/4 of SE 1/4 15-21-28 79 ft. x 185 ft. Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant is proposing an addition onto the side of his home. Approximately, 1/4 of the addition encroaches inside the rear yard setback. Due to the narrow depth of the lot, the BZA approved the request. There was no opposition.
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-11-014Orange CountyNov 3, 2005
VA-05-11-014 — INDERMATTIE TIMIRCHAND Request: SW 1/4 15-22-28 75 ft. x 105 ft. Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant is requesting a sunroom addition. The addition will be 16 ft from the rear property line. The applicant provided homeowner's association approval letter at the time of the hearing. There was no opposition.
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-11-008Orange CountyNov 3, 2005
VA-05-11-008 — ANTHONY MARRILLIA Request: NE 1/4 04-22-30 80 ft. x 101 ft. Decision: Approved Hearing: Applicant currently has a single story home. He proposes to build a second story addition which encroaches into the front yard setback. Variance requested is very minimal, roughly less than a foot. Staff received several commentaries in favor of the request. There
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-11-007Orange CountyNov 3, 2005
VA-05-11-007 — EDWIN TORRES Request: SE 1/4 of SE 1/4 26-22-31 60 ft. x 105 ft. Decision: Approved Hearing: Applicant currently has a screened porch measuring 26 ft x 10 ft at the rear of his property. He wants to add an additional 5 ft slab and enclose it with an aluminum roof. Variance requested is minor. Subject property backs up to a retention pond. There was
View decision → - Variance — approvedSE-05-11-002Orange CountyNov 3, 2005
SE-05-11-002 — ENTISAR SHAAT Request: NW 1/4 14-22-30 85 ft. x 105 ft. Decision: Approved
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-11-003Orange CountyNov 3, 2005
VA-05-11-003 — BRUCE SAHROIAN Request: NE 1/4 23-23-30 50 ft. x 110 ft. Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant is requesting a sunroom addition. The addition will be 14 ft. from the rear property line. Four commentaries in favor were received. Applicant provided approval from the homeowner's association.
View decision → - Variance — approvedSE-05-11-011Orange CountyNov 3, 2005
SE-05-11-011 — KB HOMES Request: SE 1/4 27-21-28 5 acres Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant proposes to expand the existing residential shelter by 50 clients. The site is buffered on the rear by trees and vegetation. Retention and parking areas will be provided as well. There was no opposition.
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-11-001Orange CountyNov 3, 2005
VA-05-11-001 — CONWAY VETERINARY HOSPITAL Request: NW 1/4 of NW 1/4 21-23-30 .87 acres Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant's proposal is to replace a sign within a planter adjacent to the road that was destroyed by last year's hurricanes. The original sign was installed with a property line setback in lieu of the centerline setback, which went into effect a couple o
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-11-009Orange CountyNov 3, 2005
VA-05-11-009 — CHRISTOPHER BROWN Request: NW 1/4 22-22-28 77 ft. x 125 ft. Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant is requesting a sunroom. The addition will be 17 ft. from the rear property line. The applicant provided homeowner's association approval letter at the time of the hearing. There was no opposition.
View decision → - Variance — approvedSE-05-11-006Orange CountyNov 3, 2005
SE-05-11-006 — VICTOR ROMERO Request: NE 1/4 of NW 1/4 24-22-30 1/3 acre Decision: Approved
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-11-010Orange CountyNov 3, 2005
VA-05-11-010 — Nicole Farquharson Decision: Approved
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-11-013Orange CountyNov 3, 2005
VA-05-11-013 — Todd Chase Decision: Approved
View decision → - OtherCPA05-0023Osceola CountyOct 31, 2005
CPA05-0023 Type: Comprehensive Plan — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Filed: 2005-10-31 Status: Withdrawn Source: Osceola County CPA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.
View decision → - OtherCPA05-0022Osceola CountyOct 28, 2005
CPA05-0022 Type: Comprehensive Plan — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Filed: 2005-10-28 Status: Withdrawn Source: Osceola County CPA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.
View decision → - Rezoning — deniedZMA05-0085Osceola CountyOct 25, 2005
ZMA05-0085 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2005-10-25 Status: Denied Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.
View decision → - Ordinance — passedCPA05-0021Osceola CountyOct 20, 2005
CPA05-0021 Type: Comprehensive Plan — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Filed: 2005-10-20 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County CPA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.
View decision → - Rezoning — deniedZMA05-0083Osceola CountyOct 20, 2005
ZMA05-0083 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2005-10-20 Status: Denied Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.
View decision → - Rezoning — approvedZMA05-0084Osceola CountyOct 20, 2005
ZMA05-0084 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2005-10-20 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.
View decision → - Rezoning — approvedZMA05-0082Osceola CountyOct 19, 2005
ZMA05-0082 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2005-10-19 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.
View decision → - Rezoning — approvedZMA05-0081Osceola CountyOct 11, 2005
ZMA05-0081 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2005-10-11 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.
View decision → - Rezoning — approvedZMA05-0079Osceola CountyOct 10, 2005
ZMA05-0079 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2005-10-10 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.
View decision → - Rezoning — approvedZMA05-0078Osceola CountyOct 10, 2005
ZMA05-0078 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2005-10-10 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.
View decision → - Rezoning — approvedZMA05-0080Osceola CountyOct 10, 2005
ZMA05-0080 Type: Zoning Map Amendment Filed: 2005-10-10 Status: Approved Source: Osceola County ZMA. Narrative summary not published in the open-data feed; see county portal for full case detail.
View decision → - Variance — deniedVA-05-10-005Orange CountyOct 6, 2005
VA-05-10-005 — Clear Channel Outdoor Request: billboard Decision: Denied
View decision → - Variance — deniedVA-05-10-001Orange CountyOct 6, 2005
VA-05-10-001 — Sea Wind Restaurant Decision: Denied
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-01-05-039Orange CountyOct 6, 2005
VA-01-05-039 — Joseph Perrone Request: Variance in R-1 zone to allow detached accessory storage building to remain with 758 sq. ft. of floor area in lieu of 500 sq. ft. Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant stated he purchased the property with the subject building already in existence. He bought the property specifically because of the large accessory building, which he plan
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-10-016Orange CountyOct 6, 2005
VA-05-10-016 — John Kreiner Decision: Partial Approval
View decision → - Variance — deniedVA-05-10-006Orange CountyOct 6, 2005
VA-05-10-006 — Clear Channel Outdoor Decision: Denied
View decision → - Variance — deniedVA-05-10-011Orange CountyOct 6, 2005
VA-05-10-011 — Admensa Spenser Decision: Denied
View decision → - Variance — deniedVA-05-10-009Orange CountyOct 6, 2005
VA-05-10-009 — Sukdeo Ramjas Decision: Denied
View decision → - Variance — approvedSE-05-09-007Orange CountyOct 6, 2005
SE-05-09-007 — FORT GATLIN ALLIANCE CHURCH Request: SE 1/4 of NW 1/4 07-23-30 4.3 acres Decision: Approved Hearing: A community meeting with 18 attendees was conducted prior to the public hearing. Regarding noise from the outdoor playground area, the consensus of opinion was that these are very young children who would not produce the same intensity of noise as that of ol
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-10-012Orange CountyOct 6, 2005
VA-05-10-012 — MARK NASRALLAH Request: SE 1/4 24-23-27 1 acre Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant is looking to builld new single family residence at 40 ft. in height. The house is in a latted subdivision, Lake Butler Sound. Only small portion of the rooftop is needed. Proposed house is consistent with others in the neighborhood. There was no opposition to th
View decision → - Variance — approvedVA-05-10-015Orange CountyOct 6, 2005
VA-05-10-015 — CHARLES B ADKINS Request: NW 1/4 of NE 1/4 24-21-28 1 acre Decision: Approved Hearing: The applicant proposes a detached storage building for his antique vehicles. The pitch of the roof is the basis for the height variance. The property backs up to an industrial park. The surrounding neighbors support this request. There was no opposition to this reques
View decision →