Orange County — Board of Zoning Adjustment

VA-18-12-171 — RALPH KNAPP

Request: Variance in the R-2 zoning district to allow a fully enclosed sunroom with a rear yard (south) setback of 7 ft. in lieu of 20 ft.

Decision: Approved

Hearing: Staff directed the BZA's attention to the location map, pointing out how the undeveloped right-of-way (r-o-w) behind the subject property ended at the canal r-o-w to the east. It was then shown how the continuation of the r-o-w east of the canal only consisted of an undeveloped southern half-section. It was them shown on the aerial how an apartment complex had been constructed to the north of the southern half-section east of the canal, an that some of the buildings were constructed in or adjacent to what would have been the northern half-section. The conclusion is that the road would never be constructed, which was confirmed with the Public Works Department, who also confirmed that there is no funding for such construction. However, Public Works also indicated that they would not support the abandonment of the r-o-w. If the r-o-w could be abandoned, no variance would be needed. However, since that is not feasible, the applicant is using the standards for installing a screen room to the rear of the home. Both adjacent neighbors were in support of the variance, and due to the dense vegetation in the r-o-w, there will be no impact to the resident to the south. The applicant indicated their agreement with the staff recommendation and the conditions. There being no one present to speak for or against the request, the public hearing was closed. The BZA concluded that there was no other feasible location for a logical, functional additions given the size of the lot, and the fact that the original owner constructed such a large home on a small lot, nearly completely filling the entire building envelope. A motion to recommend approval passed unanimously.