Orange County — Board of Zoning Adjustment

VA-20-11-104 — Jordan Strasberg

Request: Variance in the P-D zoning district to allow pool equipment 4 ft. from the east side property line in lieu of 5 ft.

Decision: Denied

Hearing: SYNOPSIS: Staff discussed the proposal, the location of the property, and the photos of the site. Staff provided the applicant's rationale for locating the pool equipment on the opposite side of the home from the compressor, which requires a minimum of a five (5) ft. setback. Staff indicated that alternatively there is no required setback when the equipment is located on the same side of the residence as the A/C compressor. Staff provided an analysis of the six (6) criteria and the reasons for denial, including the fact there is sufficient room on the side of the residence with the compressor to accommodate the pool equipment. Staff noted that the HOA has provided a letter of no objection, but the most impacted homeowner immediately north of the subject property had provided a letter of opposition, citing noise and close proximity to the home. The applicant responded that they were seeking a variance of one (1) ft., and the motivation for the request was an effort to maintain emergency access at the opposite side of the home. The applicant also expressed a concern that the location of the equipment at the opposite side of the residence might block windows. There was no one present to speak in favor or in opposition. The BZA concurred with the staff analysis, and noted that the majority of the windows on the side of the residence where the A/C compressor is located should not be blocked by the pool equipment. The BZA unanimously recommended denial of the variance.