Orange County — Board of Zoning Adjustment

VA-18-01-148 — STEFAN KNOPF

Request: Variance in the R-T-2 zoning district to permit construction of an accessory structure (carport) with 766 sq. ft. of floor area in lieu of 500 sq. ft. It has been determined by Public Works and Carol Knox that this is not a double frontage lot. Note: The applicant has obtained a permit to place a storage structure on the subject property. They intend to erect the carport over this container, and also to store a motorhome under it. The storage container is for recreational and yard maintenance equipment. The applicant has obtained letters of support from the three most impacted neighbors.

Decision: Approved

Hearing: Staff noted while the applicant had applied for a permit to have the storage container on the property, the permit would not be finalized until the home was issued a CO. The intent of the larger than normal carport was to allow both the storage container and a motorhome to be stored under it. It was noted that the applicant travels extensively, and the container is to keep rec and yard equipment safe. Finally, staff noted that by fully enclosing the structure, the container will be completely concealed. Staff noted that the three most impacted neighbors were in support of the request, and that there was 1 person who objected, however they did not live near. The applicant indicated that the house would be ready for a CO by April, at which time the storage container would be properly permitted. He also noted that each of his neighbors did not oppose the storage container, and that he offered to paint any color they would like. He also noted that there is not currently any motorhome, he would purchase one in a couple of years. While he would comply with fully enclosing the carport if required, he preferred that it be open so that the lot is not covered by buildings. The BZA asked the applicant if they would oppose installing shrubbery similar to that which exists along the site's First Street frontage. The applicant indicated that they would be happy to do so, as long as they could leave an open area to see and converse with their neighbor to the west. No one was present to speak for or against the application. The BZA discussed where the landscaping would be most effective, and chose a location along the W property line from a point starting at the location of a power pole nearest the carport location to the rear prop line. A motion to recommend approval with this revised condition replacing the condition to enclose the structure passed unanimously.